California with the Fuji XT-1

I spent the past week taking advantage of Spring Break to take a trip out to California with the family. We hadn’t been back to the Bay Area and Monterey for about two years, and it is one of our favorite places to visit.

For this trip, I decided to pack light and only take my Fuji XT-1 with the 23mm, 56mm and 14mm lenses. I ended up using the Fujinon XF 23mm f/1.4 lens most the time, but I did do some street photography with the Fujinon 14mm f/2.8 lens in San Francisco.

While I love the 56mm lens for portraits, the 23mm has proven to be my favorite general purpose lens. It handles itself well in most any circumstance, from portraits to travel shots. Here are some of the shots with this trio.

Statues at Cannery Row in Monterey
Statues at Cannery Row in Monterey
Chinatown in San Francisco
Chinatown in San Francisco
Fishermans Wharf in San Francisco
Fishermans Wharf in San Francisco
The Golden Gate Bridge
The Golden Gate Bridge
Drug Store Pirate along Cannery Row in Monterey
Drug Store Pirate along Cannery Row in Monterey
Fishermans Wharf in San Francisco
Fishermans Wharf in San Francisco

Fuji Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR Lens Review

The new “pro” zoom from Fuji is finally starting to hit the streets. My favorite local camera store, Competitive Cameras, actually got two in last weekend. The first guy on the list drove halfway across the state of Texas to get his. I was number two.

I became a fan of Fuji when they released the XT-1 last year. It had the feel of the manual cameras I was used to from the days of film, but with a size and feature set of a modern digital camera. I also really loved the size and build quality of their prime lenses. The 23mm and 56mm are incredible lenses. Combined with the XT-1, they make for a potent street shooting and travel combination.

Which brings us to their new big brother, the Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2.8 zoom lens. This definitely marks Fuji’s attempt at producing a pro-grade lens and the size reflects it. While I’m not selling any of my primes any time soon, I also know there is a time and place for a solid, fast short zoom.

The first reaction to mounting it on my XT-1 was “damn, this is a big lens”. This is actually pretty similar in size to the Nikon 24-120mm lens which I found to be a boat anchor after carrying it around all day on a Nikon D600.

I carry my XT-1 cross-body on a DSPTCH Standard Sling. The 16-55mm definitely sticks out further than the primes, but I didn’t find to too unbalancing, so I decided to take the chance and bring the lens home.

Here’s the 16-55mm compared to the 23mm and 56mm. Yep, it is that big, with a wide 77mm filter size to boot.

_DSC1567

And here it is hanging off the front of the XT-1. The vertical grip would probably improve the balance, but I don’t find it too bad on the XT-1. I definitely don’t see this as a lens to use on any of the other smaller Fuji bodies.

_DSC1562

The first weekend, I shot a kids birthday party to get used to the lens. It was crappy weather, so lots of high-ISO indoor shooting or flash shots with a Nissin i40. We finally had some nice weather this weekend, so I trucked the 16-55mm and family off to one of our favorite local parks for some shooting.

I’m usually a RAW shooter, but to stay consistent, all the images for the review are jpegs straight from the camera, shot in Standard profile with +1 color. Clicking an image will bring up the full sized files for pixel peepers.

First up is the obligatory wall shot to see how the lens handles in the corners. Since you’re buying this lens to shoot at f/2.8, I’ll only post those versions. I also took a set at f/8 that are extremely sharp across the frame. All shots are at ISO 200.

16mm at f/2.8
16mm at f/2.8
23mm at f/2.8
23mm at f/2.8
35mm at f/2.8
35mm at f/2.8
55mm at f/2.8
55mm at f/2.8

Center sharpness at all the focal lengths is incredible. Wide open at 16mm we get a bit of curvature and the corners are a bit soft. At 23mm and 35mm, I see just a touch of softness at the outer edges, and 85mm is essentially perfect from edge to edge. I don’t see any vignetting at any of the focal lengths, but I’ll have to try against a white background.

Overall, this is an insanely sharp, high performance lens that holds its own against the f/2.8 offerings from the big dogs. Here are a few more shots from out at the park. The small versions are a bit distorted, so click to see a visually correct version.

_DSF0428

_DSF0434

_DSF0448

_DSF0451

_DSF0459

After carrying this lens around for afternoon, I would call this lens a keeper. Like any f/2.8 zoom, you’re really buying it to use at that aperture, and it doesn’t disappoint.

The focus on this lens is extremely fast and quiet. The aperture ring has very solid detentes, more so than any of my primes, so no accidentally knocking the aperture loose. The zoom ring is just stiff enough. It is easy to turn, but the lens won’t start to creep out while hanging around your next. This was a major complaint of mine with the Nikon 24-120mm. I also like the bokeh I got from this lens.

For the bad side, this lens pretty much kills the typical stealth mode of the XT-1 with a prime. This bad boy sticks out from your body. And I’m not a fan of the lens hood. Due to how I carry the camera, I was catching my hand on the irregular edge while walking before I finally found a comfortable angle to carry it at.

So should you buy it? You really can’t go wrong with this lens assuming you can stomach the size and price. If you’re comfortable with the primes and going lean and mean, this isn’t your lens. I like the versatility this fast, sharp lens brings to the game and it will definitely be a travel companion going forwards. In fact, this lens along with its big brother, the Fujinon XF 50-140mm f/2.8 lens, are probably all some people will need.

(Note: this review was originally posted on another site I was experimenting with. I didn’t like the experiment, so I moved the review over here)

Hot Summer Nights

One of my favorite times of the year in Texas are the hot summer evenings. I enjoy going for a walk or jog in the 100+ degree late sunset hours, with the cicadas chirping full bore. I suspect this unnatural appreciation for activities in the evening heat stems back to spending a year of my life in Saudi Arabia.

I spent six months in Riyadh for the first Gulf War, from Christmas 1990 to June 1991. I worked in the world’s most heavily fortified soccer field, supporting mission crews flying RC-135s. I also spent another six months over the following two years on different stints flying aboard the AWACS.

Saudi Arabia is a strange place, and not only from a cultural perspective. As summer rolled around, temperatures would start spiking well north of 100 degrees. The blazing sun pounded down on everything like something out of a Dune novel. You tried to avoid going out during the day unless you had to.

Then evening rolled around and life found a way. The temperature stayed above 100 degrees, but it was a comfortable hot compared to the brutal daylight hours. The Saudis obviously learned this centuries ago. We would drive back from missions in the evening and there would be tents scattered throughout the desert along the roads with men sitting in front of fires, probably telling the tales their fathers used to tell them in similar settings.

These golden evenings were also the hours everyone used to exercise. I would run a few miles or play volleyball well into the night as temperatures slowly tipped south. Breathing in the hot dry air while jogging along in the silent darkness was my favorite way to keep my sanity. I don’t think I’ve ever been in as good of shape in my life as I was during my time in the sandbox.

Which brings us back to Texas. The hot summer nights here bring back that nostalgia for a more simple time 20+ years ago. I actually prefer taking a long walk in the hot summer evenings than I do during the cooler fall and winter. There is something relaxing about the heat. Outside the camaraderie, it is one of the only things I miss from the desert.

Fuji XF 10-24mm f/4 OIS Lens Review

In the beginning…

The Fujifilm XF 10-24mm F4 OIS Lens was the third lens I picked up for my Fuji X-T1. It was a bit of an oddball choice, as I tend to prefer sharp, fast primes, but I also enjoy the perspective an extreme wide angle lens can bring.

I shot if for a weekend, trying to capture my daughter at play. My first impressions weren’t that great. It is much larger than the 23mm or 56mm, so it was a bit cumbersome to use. I managed to get one good shot I like of my daughter playing on a trampoline. I grabbed it low, from the edge of the trampoline, so I really appreciated the tilting screen on the X-T1. The downside is it was hard to see in sunlight.

Trampoline

I was about ready to sell it at this point. It wasn’t syncing with my shooting style. Rather than sell it, I parked it in my bag for a bit, and soldiered on with the 23mm and 56mm.

Hello, HDR!

Fast forward a few months, and I started to get interested in HDR Photography based on the awesome work of Trey Ratcliff. I found shooting landscapes in Texas to be fairly boring due to the hot, flat light. I decided to give HDR a try, so I dug the 10-24mm back out of the bag and headed out for adventure.

To cut to the chase, I was blown away with what I got shooting a combination of the 10-24mm lens and HDR. Both handheld and on a tripod, the lens proved to be sharp and versatile. This was my first real HDR shot of a cool tavern up in the Shops at Legacy area of Plano, Texas. I shot it from a really low angle and had to time the traffic, as it was a busy Thursday evening.

Henry's Tavern

This is a shot of one of the new office towers up in the same area. Like the picture above, this was shot handheld. Both were processed in Photomatix Pro, which is an incredible piece of software for HDR photography.

Office Tower

I also wanted to try it out for nature work, so slung the X-T1 with 10-24mm over one shoulder, and my portly Gitzo tripod over the other, and headed out to the Arbor Hills Nature Preserve. The weight of the camera + lens combo was negligible, even on a hot Texas evening. I had to hunt a bit for a good spot, but ended up setting up the tripod by one of the creeks and grabbed this shot.

Creek

The lens flare in the center was my addition, as I wanted to do something with that hot spot.

The Story Now

With HDR, the 10-24mm has gone from the oddball lens in my bag to one of my favorites. If you want the wide perspective, there isn’t a better option. The images are very sharp, and even though it is much larger than the 56mm, it is still a small, discrete setup to be carrying around.

Zoom on the lens is tight, and it is all internal, so the lens doesn’t move in-and-out when slung over a shoulder. I have only shot with the OIS, and it performed really well when shooting handheld in the evening.

The only major flaw is Fuji opted for an aperture ring like the 18-55mm kit lens. It has no aperture markings on the barrel and spins endlessly in either direction. Given this is a thousand-dollar, fixed-aperture lens, I consider this a pretty big failing on Fuji’s part. This means you have to look through the viewfinder or rear screen to see what the aperture is set at. This also completely breaks the feel of the X-T1. The ring has very light detentes, so I learned the hard way it is way too easy to knock out of place.

So should you buy it? As a general addition to the kit, it is hard to justify the cost. You really need to be in to architectural or landscape photography. For a general walk-about lens, the 23mm f/1.4 kills it on size. And the 23mm lens has a real aperture ring with markings, so you know your settings at a glance. But if you’re into HDR, this lens, mounted on an X-T1, is best thing since sliced bread.

How to Take Better Pictures

The Purpose

I’m a member of multiple local photography Meetups. They’re all a great chance to get out and meet new people, and take pictures of a variety of subjects. We all share the resulting photos after the Meetups, and I’ve been incredibly shocked at how many people have invested $2,000+ in camera equipment but have no concept of post processing. I feel if you’re passionate enough to drop some serious coinage on gear, you should be equally passionate about the outcome. Too many photographers will happily debate the merits of out-of-camera (OOC) jpeg images, but then miss the point that only takes them half way to a great image. So this post is my gentle guidance and encouragement on how to get the most from your efforts.

First, a couple caveats. I am not a Photoshop Jedi. I know people who are well paid to spend most their day doing amazing things in Photoshop. I use Photoshop to a tenth of its capabilities, but I’m continuously learning. Second, if your iPhone is your primary camera and Facebook is your distribution medium, please stop here. These are not the tips you’re looking for.

I’m going to cover the basics of gear, then talk about post processing tools which will help you produce incredible images. All this is based on my own travails in photography, spanning 30+ years, from the black-and-white darkroom to the joys of the digital age. First up, the gear.

The Gear

Photography gear is the crack cocaine of photographers. I’ll readily admit to getting caught up in the world of megapixels, lenses and everything else. I enjoy going down to my favorite local camera store, Competitive Cameras, chatting with Ramses about family, and checking out all the latest toys. But all this has nothing to do with creating great images. If you want to learn to take great pictures, your required shopping list is going to be pretty short, with a few optional items that will actually contribute to your success and not just the weight of the bag you carry around.

For the camera, don’t get caught up in the megapixel games. I was taking gorgeous pictures eight years ago with a Canon 20D. Pretty much any modern camera is going to have way more pixels than you’ll ever use, so don’t let the megapixel count drive your choice. Also, while it is convenient to have a zoom lens covering a huge range, I suggest steering clear of them if you want to take stellar shots. You will want two fixed-length lenses: a 35mm equivalent and an 85mm equivalent.

Yes, I just committed photography blasphemy by suggesting you don’t need a $2,000 70-200mm zoom lens, or that super-zoom covering from 24-200mm. There are a couple reason. First is the maximum aperture. Every camera brand out there offers reasonable priced lenses with f/1.8 apertures in these two sizes. You don’t need f/1.4, but you will want f/1.8. It will matter when it comes to depth of field in your people pictures. The second reason is size. Those 24-200mm lenses are monsters you are not going to want to carry around unless you really need it. You need to have your camera with you to take good pictures, so a DSLR with a monster zoom is something that will end up staying in the bag except for special occasions.

I’m going to take the blasphemy one step farther, especially here in the United States, by suggesting you pass on a normal DSLR and go with a mirrorless camera instead. I’ll explain this choice after I detail the three kits to start with.

The Way of Fuji

I’m now a Fuji shooter, so I’m a bit partial to this option. I also violated my own suggestion for f/1.8, but that’s because Fuji is only making faster primes at these focal lengths. All the current Fuji line-up is excellent, but I’m shooting and recommending the Fujifilm X-T1. I’ve used a lot of classic film SLR cameras, like the Nikon FM3A, so I have a soft spot for the analog feel of the X-T1.

For lens, the two to own are the Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 lens, a 35mm equivalent, and the Fujifilm XF 56mm F1.2 lens, for the 85mm equivalence. Both are compact and will produce incredible pictures.

The Way of Olympus

I used to shoot Olympus in the OM-2 film days. They were known then for being compact, reliable cameras. Their new mirrorless options with the OM-D series take that even a step farther. Olympus uses a micro 4/3rds sensor, which is a bit smaller than the APS-C sensor used in the Fuji. It won’t matter for your real world shooting, so don’t get hung up on it.

The camera to grab is the Olympus OM-D E-M1. I’ve handled two of them, and if I didn’t get the Fuji, this would be the one to get. It is a very compact camera, with great features and image quality. It also feels extremely well built.

The two lenses to put on this beast are also much more affordable than their Fuji counterparts since they are f/1.8. The 35mm equivalent is the Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f1.8 lens. For the 85mm equivalent, you have the Olympus M. Zuiko 45mm f1.8 lens.

The Way of Sony

I’m going more on 2nd hand experiences of people I trust for the Sony recommendation. I’m including it primarily because Sony will supplant either Nikon or Canon for the #2 spot within the next few years for digital photography, so it is a solid investment in the future. The weakness is a lack of lenses compared to the other systems.

If you’re going to invest in Sony, the Sony a7 camera is the way to go. It is a compact camera with a full-frame sensor, unlike the other two cameras above. There is also the more expensive a7r version, which gives more megapixels, but I’m not sold on the cost/performance ratio.

Lenses are a harder problem. Since it has a full-frame sensor, there is no equivalence calculation necessary. The Sony Sonnar T* FE 35mm F2.8 lens gives you the wide angle lens and the Sony SEL55F18Z Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 lens gives you your portrait lens. Note the 35mm is only f/2.8. Sony doesn’t make a f/1.8 35mm lens (yet?).

Why Mirrorless?

I used to shoot with a full-frame Nikon D600 and have now gone mirrorless, with the setup I detailed above. While technically the Nikon will capture a better image, it is also over twice the size and weight. To take better pictures, you need to take more pictures. A lightweight camera which you can easily sling over your shoulder when heading out-and-about is way more valuable than the full-sized DSLR you left at home. I have a laptop backpack I uses for work that also carries my full Fuji setup, so I always have my camera with me. And my full Fuji kit feels lighter than my D600 with the 24-120mm f/4 zoom lens.

Mirrorless is also going to be the future. My biggest criticism of mirrorless cameras has been the electronic view finder (EVF). We’re past that problem with the three cameras I listed above, and it is only going to get better. Any of these setups above will be a solid investment in the future rather than the past.

Why Only Two?

I’m sure some of you are shocked that I’m recommending only two lenses in your kit. You may be used to those wide range super zooms that cover every focal length. The truth is you don’t need them. First, unless you’re spending $2,000+ for a zoom, it will not touch the quality of the less expensive 35mm and 85mm prime lenses I’m recommending. Second, to really take advantage of depth-of-field, you need a faster lens than an f/5.6 wonder-zoom.

I shoot with the 35mm lens as my general walk-about lens, and I put on the 85mm any time I’m taking pictures of a single person. Having a fixed-length lens will force you to think more about composition since you can’t just stand there and “turret” with your zoom. The prime lenses force you to move around more, which will cause you to think more about the angles. Finally, these two lens are much smaller and lighter than the super zooms, leading to the use-it-more because you carry-it-more philosophy.

Make it RAW!

One of the most important things you can to to get better pictures is shoot in RAW mode. You can also grab jpegs if it makes your preview life easy, but you will want to use RAW files for post processing because they contain all the detail the sensor can capture, not just the data the jpeg converter chooses to uses. You will also want to use the Adobe RGB color space for the same reason. Using a color space other than sRGB leads to extra steps in your workflow, but it is all about getting the maximum quality of pixels in to Photoshop or Lightroom.

More Gear

The above kits will easily get you out of the gate and shooting great pics. You’ll eventually want to pick up a few more pieces of gear, depending on your shooting style.

First, get a decent flash. You’ll want to be able to do fill-flash in poor lighting, and a decent TTL flash unit fits the bill. The Fuji X-T1 comes with an excellent little flash, but you can easily buy a good flash for any of them. Just follow the keep-it-compact mindset so the flash stays with you and not gathering dust on a shelf.

Second, consider a third lens based on your shooting style. Either go with a wide-angle or telephoto lens to match your style. A zoom will work in this case. For example, I’m not a sports photographer, but I do like landscapes, so I picked up the Fujifilm XF 10-24mm F4 lens. Your third lens should be chosen to cover your primary area of interest.

Third, if you do landscape or HDR, get a good tripod. I’m partial to American-made quality, so check out Really Right Stuff. Yes, a good carbon fiber tripod and ball head will set you back over a thousand dollars, but you’ll only ever make that investment once.

Finally, get a strap and bag to make hauling your kit around easy. My hands-down favorite strap is the Dsptch sling. The standard sling is perfect for mirrorless cameras, and it makes carrying the camera around effortless. For the bag, I use a Timbuk2 Sleuth camera backpack for work, since it carries my whole camera kit as well as my work laptop. For camera-only carry, I’m partial to the Think Tank Retrospective 5. It carries my X-T1 will all three lenses, plus a spare battery, flash and cleaning clothes.

Photoshop and Lightroom

If you’re willing to invest in a good camera, you have to be willing to invest in the software to get good results. That means signing up for Adobe’s Photography Program. For about $10/month, you get access to Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom, the two best tools available to digital photographers. If you’re new to these tools, pick one to use to start with and get proficient at before using the other. I’m partial to Photoshop, so I rarely use Lightroom, but it is nice too.

You also have to invest in learning the tools. There are a lot of books out there on both of these tools, but I’ve learned the most from quality video training. The best training I have found for Photoshop is Phlean. They have a whole YouTube cannel of cool, free tutorials, and for the aspiring Photoshop Jedi, they have the Photoshop 101 and Photoshop 201 PRO Tutorials which are only $25 each. This is a trivial investment for the amount of frustration both of these courses will save you.

KelbyOne is also decent. It’s a bit more expensive at an ongoing $25/month, but you get access to a lot of tutorials on Lightroom and Photoshop, as well as a subscription to Photoshop User magazine. The tutorials are hit-or-miss, but the ones on Lightroom 5 are excellent, so it is worth it for a month-or-two to get through those.

Plugins and Presets

A real man would dive into Photoshop and learn how to do every complicated edit himself. I have a real job though, so I’m more than willing to invest in time saving tools that make the limited time I have with Photoshop more productive. This is an area where a lot of photographers miss out on how to make their lives easier. There are three tools I’m going to recommend. Using any one of them alone will dramatically improve the potential quality of your photos, even more so than spending on another fancy lens. For a basis of comparison, here is an image of the beautiful Ashley I took this weekend. This is a jpeg straight from the camera, cropped for 8×10. Click on the image to see a larger version — the downscaled versions shown below aren’t good examples.

Ashley (Base)

Nik Collection

First up is the Nik Collection from Google. For $149, you get an extensive suite of Photoshop filters that cover adjustments, sharpening and even HDR. Color Efex Pro is one of my favorite filters. It allows you to easily do a large number of image adjustments. Here is Ashley’s photo again, except I’ve run Dfine 2, Color Efex Pro and Sharpener Pro 3. The adjustments are subtle, but can make a big difference.

nik

The Nik Collection also includes Analog Efex 2, which allows you to easily apply retro film effects to images. Here is Ashley with one of the classic film effects. This isn’t something you would use on every shot, and is a bit strong for my taste, but it gives you easy options.

Ashley (Analog)

VSCO Film

The VSCO Film Presets have gotten a bit of a bad rep in the photography world, mostly because they are so widely used. They are the Twitter Bootstrap of post processing. VSCO provides Lightroom and Adobe Camera Raw (ACR) presets that quickly adjust images to look like classic films. For example, here’s Ashley with the Fuji Astia 100F preset, as well as some exposure tweaks and sharpening in Lightroom.

Ashley (VSC)

I’ve found VSCO can work well for a lot of images, but it can often be too much of a hammer. If your workflow involves processing a couple hundred images for a wedding, VSCO can be a Godsend in time savings for quickly processing a batch of files and making them look decent.

Greater Than Gatsby

My final recommendation are the Photoshop actions from Greater Than Gatsby, with the Innocence Collection in particular. This collection allows for a very fine-grained application of effects through layers, layer masks and transparency in Photoshop.

Here is a version of the Ashley photo which has had a lot of subtle edits applied with the Innocence Collection.

Ashley (Gatsby)

Recommendations

Any of these tools can dramatically improve the quality of your final photos. You still need to learn Photoshop or Lightroom to handle basic retouching and correction, but these tools will take you the extra mile quickly. I’ve landed on the Photoshop filters from Greater Than Gatsby as my preferred tool for workflow. Even running the Clean Edit Color Base from their Free Photoshop Collection will probably improve your image 100%. Combine that with the Facebook Resize and Sharpen action, and you’re well down the path to producing beautiful images in Photoshop.

I actually started with the Nik Collection, and then VSCO, so I know you can also get good results with them. Greater Than Gatsby handily beats either of them for the price though. What I’ve found is once I was comfortable with layers, layer masks and transparency in Photoshop, the Greater Than Gatsby actions were a much stronger tool suite. Also, I would recommend only getting the Innocence Collection. It is their ultimate collection for portrait retouching.

Other Tools

One of the weaknesses of the Fuji cameras is they use an X-Trans sensor. It is capable of capturing incredible images, but Adobe has weak support for RAW files shot on Fuji cameras. If you really want the best quality possible shooting RAW with Fuji cameras, you’ll need to pickup Iridient Developer. You can easily open RAW image files from Adobe Bridge into Iridient Developer, tune the conversion, then save them as PSD files and open them automatically in Photoshop CC. The quality difference between ACR and Iridient Developer is huge, and it is well worth the investment.

Another tool to consider is Photomatix Pro for HDR photography. This will be you go-to tool for combining bracketed images to create a single HDR image. If you are into HDR Photography, I highly recommend checking out Stuck in Customs. Trey Ratcliff shoots some incredibly beautiful HDR photographs, and even has an excellent Complete HDR Tutorial with videos which I highly recommend.

In Closing

I’ve gotten a lot off my chest here. The TL:DR to taking good pictures is put together a simple kit you’ll actually carry with you, get Photoshop or Lightroom, learn it using Phlearn, and use tools like Greater Than Gatsby to streamline your workflow. And don’t forget the most important part: take more pictures. You’ll be amazed at your results and will enjoy photography a lot more.

Also, you can keep up with my growing portfolio over on 500px. It has my more recent photos, as well as a lot of shots with the Fuji X-T1.